There is an article on Straits Times on June 29, 2008 “It’s poison to profit from death of strangers”. I think it is good to provide some more additional information here.

In Singapore, Traded Life Policies (TLP) are used an umbrella term used to describe “viatical settlements” and “life settlements”. They involve the life policies of those who have experienced a decline in life expectancy. Viatical settlements involve the life policies of those who are terminally ill, while life settlements involve the policies of those, typically over the age of 65, who have experienced a decline in health and life expectancy.

A viatical settlement is the sale of a life insurance policy by the policy owner before the policy matures. Such a sale, at a price discounted from the face amount of the policy but usually in excess of the premiums paid or current cash surrender value, provides the seller an immediate cash settlement. Generally, viatical settlements involve insured individuals with a shorter life expectancy, e.g. terminal illness.

From the perspective of the investor, purchasing a viatical settlement is similar to buying a bond with a negative coupon and an uncertain redemption date. The return depends on the seller’s life expectancy and when he or she dies.

A life settlement is a financial transaction in which a policy owner possessing an unneeded or unwanted life insurance policy sells the policy to a third party for more than the cash surrender value. The purchaser becomes the new beneficiary of the policy at maturation and is responsible for all subsequent premium payments.

The market is still not mature here. A quick check from MAS website will find the latest press release of life settlement was way back to 2004.

While it might be too quick to conclude that such products are unethical as you reap return when some people die, Life settlements are an important development in that they have opened a secondary market for life insurance in which policy owners can access fair market value for their policies, rather than accepting the lower cash surrender value from the issuing life insurance company.


We disagree with the view expressed by some respondents that TEP/TLPs are illegal because the investor does not have an insurable interest in the life policy. We concur with other respondents that a life insurance policy can be considered personal property, and can be assigned, and that the principle of insurable interest need only exist at the time the policy is effected. It is not required for any subsequent assignment of the policy.


About the Author

Ivan Guan is the author of the popular book "FIRE Your Retirement". He is an independent financial adviser with more than a decade of knowledge and experience in providing financial advisory services to both individuals and businesses. He specializes in investment planning and portfolio management for early retirement. His blog provides practical financial tips, strategies and resources to help people achieve financial freedom. Follow his Telegram Channel to join the FIRE community.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. This does not reflect the official position of any agency, organization, employer or company. Refer to full disclaimers here.

  • Traded life policies from beneficiaries in the United States which are offered for sale by intermediaries can be sold to members of the public in Singapore or any other part of Asia. Quote There are no MAS administered regulations which govern the sale, purchase and distribution of Traded Life Policies. This means that ANY individual or Company involved in buying or distributing these policies is not regulated by MAS under the SFA. This is an extract from Money in other words MAS

  • {"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}